Deanna Stover is an Assistant Professor at Christopher Newport University. This website is a compilation of her syllabi since starting at CNU in Fall 2020.
About Me Blog:
Blog Post Due: Sunday, January 23rd at 11:59 pm
Percentage: 10%
Review Blog:
Peer Review: Wednesday, February 2nd (in class)
Blog Post Due: Sunday, February 6th at 11:59 pm
Percentage: 10%
TEI Blog:
Peer Review: Wednesday, February 16th (in class)
Blog Post Due: Sunday, February 20th at 11:59 pm
Percentage: 10%
Reflection Blog:
Blog Post Due: Finals Week (see schedule)
Percentage: 10%
Total Percentage: 40%
You will write four research blog posts over the course of the semester using GitHub/Jekyll. To get started, make sure you complete my tutorial.
We’ll be doing several different kinds of posts on the blog, the details for which are below, but keep in mind that this is a research blog, so keep your tone professional (rather than informal) throughout. (That doesn’t mean you can’t have fun–just be aware of the context and audience.)
Check out “How to Submit” to figure out how to turn in your assignment to Scholar.
You will write 400-600 words describing your academic self (with enough about the personal that makes you feel comfortable, keeping in mind the FERPA notice on the syllabus). If you go over the word limit, that’s fine! But try and be concise.
You should include at least one image and at least five other instances of markdown to format your posts, whether that’s inserting links or simply emphasizing words.
Some ideas to get you started, but you can write anything as long as it is appropriate:
Regarding the image, feel free to add a picture of yourself, although it’s not required (again, see the information about FERPA on the syllabus). However, you must use some sort of image if you don’t want to include an image of yourself. It could be a pet, for instance.
To insert a picture, simply do the following:
The first thing you need to do is create an images folder. You do this by going to Add File then Create New File. You will then type in images/profile.md
(or whatever–the important part is the images/. You can delete the .md file later. It’s just there so that you have a folder.) Don’t forget to Commit your changes.
Once you’ve created the folder, make sure you’re in the images
folder the click Add File then Upload Files. You can then drag and drop your picture into GitHub. Don’t forget to Commit.
Tips:
To add your image into your blog, first go to your _posts
folder then to the appropriate post. Once you click the edit button (the pencil), you can type ![Alt Text](link)
(filling in the blanks as appropriate. Your link should be the path to the image. So username.github.io/repositoryname/images/imagetitle.filetype. Don’t forget to commit.
And remember, always check to see if the image is showing up on your actual blog, not just the preview in GitHub. If it’s not, you’re using the wrong link (tip: if your link has “blob” or “github.com” in it, you’re using the wrong link. Instead, you need to use the path that looks something like this: https://deanna-stover.github.io/deanna-stover/images/Profile.jpg).
Based on the reviews you read in preparation, write a review of a digital humanities project from the list I have provided on the Google Drive. You must claim a project by putting your name next to one of the options so that not everyone in class reviews the same project. Do this by class on Monday, January 24th. Make sure to pick something that other people have not yet claimed.
This blog should be 600-750 words. Remember that you can be critical and still polite or appreciative but still evaluative.
Include at least two images of the project you’re reviewing. But if your project is extra complex, remember, you may need more.
Tip: Check out the “Review Content” section from Reviews in DH to get some more ideas for what a review entails. And do pay attention in class–we’ll go over more tips and tricks!
Make sure you use the following format for introducing your blog post:
Project:
Project Name
Project Director(s):
Project Director Name
Project URL:
Project URL
In this blog, you’ll write 300-500 words explaining the process of coding our text and reflecting on the final outcome. This can be about the difficulties you faced or something interesting you found in the reading. You’ll also explain any coding decisions you made.
Include at least two images, one of which shows your TEI on paper (what we did in the Google Doc!) and one of which shows your computer code (either the whole thing, or just a portion works since you’ll also be submitting your code to me). You may also want to include a (cropped!) screenshot of your tweets over the course of the project!
We’ll go over more tips in class, but here are a few to get you started:
Be positive. You can be frustrated by parts of the project and discuss that, but remember, you always want to maintain positivity in your online persona. So, think critically about why you were frustrated and try to explain what frustrated you rather than going on a rant.
Use images well. Rather than putting them all at the bottom, think about placement.
Organize your writing. For instance, you may spend one paragraph introducing your part of the project, then one paragraph on the Google Doc excercise, then two paragraphs on actually using Oxygen, then you’ll conclude.
Explain questions you had while you were coding or decisions you had to make.
Did you notice new things about the reading by having to read it so closely? Or maybe the writing style? Try and find a way to blend this into your narrative!
Keep paragraphs relatively short for easy reading!
If you want to include code of any kind you need to use three ticks around the code. So three of these: `
Be professional. Even though this is a reflection, don’t get sidetracked by other topics. You can have fun while maintaining a professional persona–promise!
Continue trying to be more concise while varying sentence length.
In this 750-850 word blog, you’ll be reflecting on the class.
You need to have at least two images in your blog post. This can be one of your tweets, a mock-up from your grant, a project that inspired you from the course, or something else entirely!
A few questions to get you started thinking about the class as a whole:
Basically, think about the class as a whole. What has worked for you and what hasn’t?
Keep in mind the following:
Keep paragraphs short for easy reading!
Be professional.
Continue trying to be more concise while varying sentence length.
Organize your writing. You may do this chronologically or topic-based, for instance.
Please don’t mention your grades. It’s not necessary and it puts you in a vulnerable spot. Instead, you can talk about how an assignment was difficult for you or how much fun you had doing a certain project. No grades. It’s just not worth it and it puts both of us in a weird position.
Please don’t quote my feedback. That’s something personal between the two of us. You can, however, talk about how my feedback was helpful as you moved forward or how you felt that you needed more guidance at a particular point.
This isn’t a rant or a time to gloat. If you had problems with the class, you can discuss why, but save a lot of that for your reviews of me and the course. You can be critical of readings, of course, and you can discuss frustrations, but please don’t, well, rant. On the other hand, if you loved a particular assignment or the course as a whole, that’s great (really great!), but think critically about it too. What worked for you and what didn’t?
To find the URL for your blog, you’ll need to go to Settings on GitHub, scroll down to “GitHub Pages”, click the link, and then find your post. Once you’ve done that, simply copy and paste what is in the browser bar.
Your URL should start with something like this: https://deanna-stover.github.io/ NOT like this: https://github.com/deanna-stover/
Under “Assignments” on Scholar, please use the Text Submission “Write Submission” button to enter the URL to your blog and then upload a screenshot of your code. To capture all your code, just go into “Raw” or the edit file portion of GitHub. To do the latter, you will need to choose the “soft wrap” option in GitHub in order to see all of the text/markdown at once. This option is in the upper left hand corner of where you edit your file. I’ll be able to see all your writing and the code that way.
Peer Review: If you have a peer review assignment with any blog post, please upload the feedback you received along with your code. While there is no grade for peer review per se, I will take into account whether you participated in peer review when calculating your grade for the assignment.
I will be subtracting 5 points for every day your assignment is late unless you’ve been been given an extension.
Thinks critically whether you’re writing a review or a process post or just introducing yourself
Shows professionalism – i.e. that you took this assignment seriously – and pays attention to audience, meaning you found the balance between writing for the public and writing about yourself and your research. Your blog should not be too informal nor too technical.
Presents information in an organized, concise, and coherent way. Remember, part of being organized in digital writing is breaking up those paragraphs!
Follows instructions for the appropriate blog post and takes advantage of the platform (in other words, you use Markdown appropriately)
Utilizes proper mechanics; style, sentence structure, and spelling promote coherence, clarity, and credibility